Re: RPATH status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>>   3 /usr/lib64/firefox-2.0.0.2
>> Some of them are intentional, such as the above.  It's either rpath or
>> munging LD_LIBRARY_PATH at startup if you want a working firefox.
> 
> RPATH is perfectly fine for these purposes.

[Dang it!  why did it send the mail already?]

I meant to add:

If you want a relocatable package you can use $ORIGIN though.  So, if
the binary is in /usr/bin (e.g., devhelp), you make the RPATH

  $ORIGIN/../lib64/firefix-2.0.0.2

Then the package is relocatable (at least wrt to this binary).

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux