Re: RPATH status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:58:57AM -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> >I've noticed that there are still many binaries in /usr/bin that have
> >RPATH hardcoded in them.
> 
> 
> >  3 /usr/lib64/firefox-2.0.0.2
> 
> Some of them are intentional, such as the above.  It's either rpath or 
> munging LD_LIBRARY_PATH at startup if you want a working firefox.

BTW, the current packaging guidelines don't permit rpath at all and
suggest to put a config in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/, but that doesn't look
right in this case. I guess rpath for plugins/modules should be
allowed.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux