Re: umask in rpm scriptlets - yes or no?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:35:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:

> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Rex Dieter said: 
> >>> Does anybody know whether anything has been decided on setting an
> >>> explicit "umask 022" at the beginning of scriptlets?
> >> Looks like it's not a bad idea. 
> > I would strongly suggest that this is something that is best enforced
> > in rpm itself rather than in every scriplet.
> 
> Even better, sure.

Better? Yes.  Becoming reality in the short-term? Probably not.
Becoming reality for FC-6 and FC-5? Less likely.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux