Re: umask in rpm scriptlets - yes or no?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
>>> Does anybody know whether anything has been decided on setting an
>>> explicit "umask 022" at the beginning of scriptlets?
>> Looks like it's not a bad idea. 
> I would strongly suggest that this is something that is best enforced
> in rpm itself rather than in every scriplet.

Even better, sure.

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux