Re: VNC development plan - discuss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas napsal(a):
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:33:33AM +0100, Adam Tkac wrote:
Hi all,

viewers), one real server, one virtual server and X module. What do you think about this idea?

Just orphan the vnc servers you don't want to maintain, if somebody is
interested then they'll be kept. For the parts that are tighlty
integrated in fedora (for example a vnc server used by anaconda) it is
indeed better to have only one vnc server used.

--
Pat

I don't want leave vnc maintaning. I only want fire away duplicates (vino + krfb, I don't maintain any of these) and substitute it by more scalable x11vnc. I think vino + krfb maintainers could write comment here what they think about this change. And about only one server - I think it is so hard to write all-in-one server with good "real desktops" and "virtual desktops" performance. But it is development challenge :)

Adam

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux