Re: FC6 updates broken deps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



dragoran wrote:

because this way its nothing but a hack that does not solve the main problem: yum should _NOT_ fail to update a package because a unreleated package has a dep problem.

Let me re-phrase it:

The light in the kitchen should not fail to function because a bulb in the basement is broken.

Having a modular architecture is fine and all, but basic functionality _must_ be included in the core. The skip-broken thing is so obvious, it boggles the mind there's even a discussion about it.

It would be nice if Red Hat could conduct (more) usability tests on software that's important for the OS. That would probably de-nerdify a lot of applications.

--
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux