seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:43 +0100, Denis Leroy wrote:
Denis Leroy wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 00:06 -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 22:51 +0100, dragoran wrote:
I think we should agree that yum _is_ broken here and needs to be
fixed.
and no including a optional plugin won't help, the default behavior
is broken ( I would even say its a security bug)
Does anyone else have an odd feeling of deja-vu?
It's so annoying that I'm thinking about learning python just so I can
submit a patch to fix it... :(
While learning Python is a great idea, writing yum patches is
unfortunately known to be a complete and utter waste of time :-(
Correcting statement above:
s/patches/patches that add new features to yum/
?? What're you talking about?
Maybe I'm mistaken. If I submit a patch that integrates --skip-broken
into yum, will you accept it ? I'd be more than happy to write that patch.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
