Re: Detecting the need for additional kernel options?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:34:12PM -0500, Michel Salim wrote:
 > Is Anaconda currently checking the machine configuration against a
 > compatibility database? On some AMD64 laptops (including my HP L2000),
 > the machine would lock up randomly (without any log message) if booted
 > without "noapic" (I added "nosmp" for good measure).
> > Perhaps a user-maintainable database; we can consider tying it in with
 > Smolt so that only users who own a particular model can submit
 > required kernel options for it (to verify ownership, give the user a
 > token that they must pass to Smolt, e.g. smoltSendProfile
 > --key=AF32EBD4008)
> > Speaking of Smolt, the CPUspeed reported does not seem that useful,
 > unless it interfaces with CPUspeed to first set the clockspeed to
 > minimum, take a measurement, then set it to maximum, measure, and then
 > restore the original setting? My 2GHz laptop was reported as a 1.6 ..

instead of faffing about changing speeds, it could just report
the contents of /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
if present.

+1.

Or if its preferable to only have the max speed, just grab it from /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq if present, and fall back to looking in /proc/cpuinfo scaling_max_freq isn't there.

--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux