Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 22:51 +0100, dragoran wrote:
I think we should agree that yum _is_ broken here and needs to be fixed.
and no including a optional plugin won't help, the default behavior is
broken ( I would even say its a security bug)
Does anyone else have an odd feeling of deja-vu?
Yes, and a strong one at that.
This and "but it shouldn't abort when unresolvable dependencies are
present" threads (among various other non-yum related ones) keep
recurring every few months.
Perhaps there is a connection with the fact that yum _is_ broken?
I suggest you should study the relation between cause and effect, it's
really illuminating once you learn it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
