Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 10:46 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 10:25, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > > > * unclear role of FESCo, not enough steering -- instead: the drive
> > > > that "you don't need to be in FESCo to get something done",
> > >
> > > I don't even know what you mean by this.
> >
> > That's sad. But you're not listed as a FESCo member anyway.
> 
> That's unfortunate, as I was dragged back into FESCo recently.

My fault for forgetting to update the FESCo page for the the recent
FESCo additions.  I'll update the page accordingly.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux