Simo Sorce wrote:
> You should understand that "property" is natural only for physical
> objects, just because possession of a physical object can be controlled
> by physical means and cannot be easily replicated.
>
> Abstract objects like ideas, but also anything that can be replicated at
> zero cost without destroying the original, can't be subject to real
> property.
>
You mean I can't put a license on my code that says: you may use this,
but if you change it and redistribute it you must also redistribute your
changes?
Because that also means that I control what is done with my code. You
make it sound like all ideas should be in the public domain.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
