On 23.02.2007 13:47, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:15:54 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
- if we had some kind backing for a non-free repo from Red Hat or some
other "Big Company" when it comes to knocking of doors to ask questions
like "Hi Adobe, may we include a Adobe Reader RPM in the non-free
community repo foo? They would do some some minor adjustments to the RPM
to make it perfectly work with Fedora; that best for both sides"
?? Contradictory. It's closed-source. Basically, you don't want to
include it in that repo at all.
Well, or yet another repo (but that might be to confusing) -- that
depends on the definition of "non-free" in this case.
CU
thl
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
