Thomas M Steenholdt schrieb:
seth vidal wrote:
and this is why the update system is writing out update data. So, we can
differentiate b/t update for feature and update for security, or
different grades of a security update.
then we can work more intelligently on:
yum update security-critical-only (as an example)
That would be a nice thing for sure, but would really depend on the
inclusion of some sort of --continue-on-failure functionality of yum.
It makes no sense to provide a "security updates only" option, if the
20 security updates in there could potentially be held back because of
a dep problem with one of them.
I've said this a thousand times over and I'll say it again. I would
*much* rather have 1 package with a known security problem (held back
because of a dep issue with that package), than 20.
+1 !
there is no reason to hold back an update because of a broken dep thats
not even related to it.
/Thomas
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
