On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 07:39 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > and it would give users very little awareness that something didn't get > patched. > > giving them a false sense of security. > And also leave them potentially vulnerable to a larger number of issues. In some cases, some patching is better than no patching. If httpd doesn't get updated for a hot zero-day exploit because of a dependency issue with gimp and my system gets exploited, that seems like a bad thing. -- David Hollis <dhollis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
