On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:13:14PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >The proximate causes of this failure were (1) incompetent repository > >maintenance, making any nontrivial upgrade certain to founder on a > >failed dependency, and (2) the fact that rpm is not statically linked > >-- so it's possible to inadvertently remove a shared library it > >depends on and be unrecoverably screwed. But the underlying problems > >run much deeper. > We only have your analysis of the problem. Not a description of the > actual problem. That would be more helpful. Perhaps a bug report. Yes, excellent advice. Eric, here's a document which may help you get better answers rather than the storm of flames: <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list