On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 09:24 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 at 9:14am, Jeremy Katz wrote > > The default is for the driver to be suspended normally; SUSPEND_MODULES > > is to list (broken) modules that have to be removed and reinserted > > around the suspend process. > > Is it considered a (fixable, bugzillable) bug if normal suspending works > but has undesirable effects? Example -- on my Thinkpad Z61t, suspend and > wake-up worked out of the box with FC6, but the power drain was impressive > (I have the figures at home, but it was >50% battery of capacity > overnight). Some experimenting demonstarted that removing the USB modules > before going to sleep dropped the sleeping power consumption considerably, > so I put those in SUSPEND_MODULES. I figured this was model specific so I > didn't bugzilla it. Should I? It definitely doesn't hurt to file it so that it can be tracked. And should probably be filed against kernel Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
