Re: Fedora power management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 at 9:14am, Jeremy Katz wrote

The default is for the driver to be suspended normally; SUSPEND_MODULES
is to list (broken) modules that have to be removed and reinserted
around the suspend process.
Is it considered a (fixable, bugzillable) bug if normal suspending works 
but has undesirable effects?  Example -- on my Thinkpad Z61t, suspend and 
wake-up worked out of the box with FC6, but the power drain was impressive 
(I have the figures at home, but it was >50% battery of capacity 
overnight).  Some experimenting demonstarted that removing the USB modules 
before going to sleep dropped the sleeping power consumption considerably, 
so I put those in SUSPEND_MODULES.  I figured this was model specific so I 
didn't bugzilla it.  Should I?
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux