On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 11:51 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Dnia 06-02-2007, wto o godzinie 06:03 -0500, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx > napisał(a): > [..] > > GConf2-2.16.0-6.fc7 > > ------------------- > > * Mon Feb 05 2007 Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2.16.0-6 > > - Split off a -gtk subpackage to reduce dependencies > > IMO this split is kind of nonsens. Even if this split have some sense it > is not all/it is buggy. > > Why this split is buggy ? Because gnome-session requires and uses > gconf-sanity-check-2 program (IIRC check for availability in build > enviromet for gconf-sanity-check-2 is performed in autoconf suit of > gnome-session and grep on gnome-session will show from where it is > runed/used by gnome-session). > So .. this split without add "Requires: GConf2-gtk" and "BuildRequires: > GConf2-gtk" to gnome-session is plain bug. Why don't you check the gnome-session spec before sending uninformed mail ? I did add just those, at the same time as I did the split. > > Why this split is kind of nonsens ? Because IIRC there is no program > which uses GConf2 and not uses gtk+. > > So .. if there is no packages which uses GConf2 and not uses gtk+ .. > better will be reverte this split and keep gconf-sanity-check-2 in > GConf2 binary package. Do you think I did that just for fun ? I have split it off because I have been asked by people who want to use GConf with gtk+. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
