Dnia 06-02-2007, wto o godzinie 06:03 -0500, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx napisał(a): [..] > GConf2-2.16.0-6.fc7 > ------------------- > * Mon Feb 05 2007 Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2.16.0-6 > - Split off a -gtk subpackage to reduce dependencies IMO this split is kind of nonsens. Even if this split have some sense it is not all/it is buggy. Why this split is buggy ? Because gnome-session requires and uses gconf-sanity-check-2 program (IIRC check for availability in build enviromet for gconf-sanity-check-2 is performed in autoconf suit of gnome-session and grep on gnome-session will show from where it is runed/used by gnome-session). So .. this split without add "Requires: GConf2-gtk" and "BuildRequires: GConf2-gtk" to gnome-session is plain bug. Why this split is kind of nonsens ? Because IIRC there is no program which uses GConf2 and not uses gtk+. So .. if there is no packages which uses GConf2 and not uses gtk+ .. better will be reverte this split and keep gconf-sanity-check-2 in GConf2 binary package. kloczek -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
