On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 11:32 +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> >>>>> "NP" == Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> NP> This would put me in the "just not about everyone" group as I use
> NP> postfix and UUCP. It was really easy to setup, but I might have to
> NP> try out something different for more effective anti-spam stuff.
>
> Notice that Exim CAN do UUCP, just not UUCP bang paths. That is, the
> old foo!bar!baz stuff.
And I'm not masochistic enough to actually want bang paths ;-), I just
think that UUCP is a good way to hook up a machine with mail that's not
always on and gets dynamic IP addresses. I just wanted to counter the
notion a bit that everyone who uses UUCP uses sendmail.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
