On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 18:51 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >>>>> "MM" == Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > MM> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:04:58PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > >> That's because people get flamed to a crisp when they even suggest
> > >> sendmail. I still use it on almost all of my servers.
> >
> > MM> sendmail can do things no other MTA can. Period.
> >
> > MM> 99.44% of people do not need those things, but the remainder
> > MM> _really_ needs them.
> >
> > Is there really anything useful left which exim can't do? UUCP bang
> > paths are the only limitation I can think of off the cuff, and
> > hopefully noone uses those. Exim can do UUCP with domain addressing
> > though, if anyone still uses UUCP.
>
> Yes, I have a few sites that require it.... but then I also know how
> to 'yum install sendmail' too, as I'm sure just about everyone who
> uses UUCP does, or else compiles sendmail themsleves.
This would put me in the "just not about everyone" group as I use
postfix and UUCP. It was really easy to setup, but I might have to try
out something different for more effective anti-spam stuff.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
