fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ralf Ertzinger) writes:
>> Abort transaction when it is ambiguous (kickstart)
>
> Err, no. If a dependency can be satisfied in various ways then anaconda
> is free to choose any one of the possibilities at it's discretion in my
> book.
Such a behavior is just a maintainance nightmare. 'kickstart' is used to
build systems in a reproducible way. Having a clear semantic ("transactions
must be always unambigous") would help to avoid bad surprises.
(This works for years with 'apt'.)
Enrico
Attachment:
pgpYKtNWJsJA5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
