Tanguy Eric wrote:
Le mardi 23 janvier 2007 à 03:13 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Tanguy Eric wrote:
I sent this message to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx but i had no reaction so i
try also the devel one because i find this is problem we have to solve
for the core and extras merge, no ?
I'm tired to have problems with rt2500 driver at each new fedora kernel
release because the versionning seems to not follow standards :
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2965
What do you think about this ?
Someone have similar problems with other modules ?
This one is going all the way up to Linus since apparently he prefers
the current naming. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20070111
for the glorious details.
Rahul
Ok but my problem is not really the kernel name but how a driver can
detect correctly the kernel version and eventually the backported patch
to compile fine ...
Yes. The name of the kernel is directly related to that issue.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
