Le mardi 23 janvier 2007 à 03:13 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : > Tanguy Eric wrote: > > I sent this message to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx but i had no reaction so i > > try also the devel one because i find this is problem we have to solve > > for the core and extras merge, no ? > > > > I'm tired to have problems with rt2500 driver at each new fedora kernel > > release because the versionning seems to not follow standards : > > http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2965 > > > > What do you think about this ? > > > > Someone have similar problems with other modules ? > > This one is going all the way up to Linus since apparently he prefers > the current naming. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20070111 > for the glorious details. > > Rahul > Ok but my problem is not really the kernel name but how a driver can detect correctly the kernel version and eventually the backported patch to compile fine ... Eric -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
