On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 16:40 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:08:25AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 15:59 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > As a substitute or a complement to something similar with fedora > > > legacy, it has more or less been suggested to allow for an upgrade path > > > to RHEL. Should we set this as an objective for fedora? It could > > > > IMO, NO. We have no control over RHEL, it's packaging, or it's upgrade > > policies. > > Indeed, but couldn't it be possible to build up minimal coordination on > that matter? Frankly, I doubt it's worth it at the moment. Fedora has much bigger things to get done. > I am not talking about supporting anything. But about having maintainers > who care about the issue, and try to smooth things (from both sides of > the fence). > > This should of course be something like a non-binding goal, think of it > about an upgrade path less likely to break. You're talking about upgrading to a product you have to purchase from Red Hat. That purchase includes support. I doubt Red Hat will support upgrading from Fedora. Unless of course you meant CentOS. In which case I still think it's not worth worrying about. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
