On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:08:25AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 15:59 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As a substitute or a complement to something similar with fedora > > legacy, it has more or less been suggested to allow for an upgrade path > > to RHEL. Should we set this as an objective for fedora? It could > > IMO, NO. We have no control over RHEL, it's packaging, or it's upgrade > policies. Indeed, but couldn't it be possible to build up minimal coordination on that matter? > I asked today if you could upgrade from RHEL4 to RHEL5 and was told "not > officially".¹ So if RHEL can't even officially support upgrading from > previous versions of itself, there's no way Red Hat will support > upgrading from Fedora. I am not talking about supporting anything. But about having maintainers who care about the issue, and try to smooth things (from both sides of the fence). This should of course be something like a non-binding goal, think of it about an upgrade path less likely to break. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
