On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 18:19 -0200, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote: > Em Ter, 2007-01-16 às 11:50 -0500, Jesse Keating escreveu: > > > > > > Now, the situation as it had persisted thoughout recent years is about > > > to change again: Core seems (?) to be in progress of being opened. > > > I.e. it's up to you+RH to pick up this opportunity to change something > > > about "Legacy". I am offering to contribute to a "Legacy within Fedora" > > > > > > Unfortunately you and Warren seem to be choke this option once more. So > > > be it - Your decision. > > > > That's because at least I don't see the need to try and hammer the square > > Fedora peg into the LTS hole. Especially when there are nice round pegs like > > RHEL with actual support and SLAs or CentOS with a large and vibrant > > community, both of which are based on Fedora, that fit perfectly into that > > LTS hole. Why continue beating a square peg into a round hole? > > > > This is closely related to a marketing problem Fedora has - a lot of > people think it's a beta distribution. Probably one of Fedora's biggest > problems still. > > Personally I think it would be interesting to see the CentOS project > merge with Fedora, to provide a Fedora "LTS" or whatever. Then all the > people that complain about Fedora's lack of stability would be told to > install a different Fedora product, instead of something from a totally > separate project. > > I think it's obvious the demand for what CentOS provides is there, and > there's more than enough people willing to contribute to it. > Centos is a pure rebuild of the srpms released with RHEL. Then centos adds on tools in separate distros to support the distro. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
