On Tuesday 16 January 2007 10:26, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > In other words: By you personally insisting on a separate Legacy Project > and RH not granting community access to Core, an option you + RH could > easily "buy-in" is being wasted. This is your decision, not mine. Given that Legacy started before I was a Red Hat employee, and before there was even Extras, it had to start externally as a separate project, using the name Fedora though. By it being a "separate" project, all that really meant was a different infrastructure. Since none that people outside of Red Hat could access existed, I don't see any other way. By the time Extras spun up and it was viable to make use of that infrastructure for Legacy uses, the interest in Legacy was so low that it seemed rather pointless. > > Now, the situation as it had persisted thoughout recent years is about > to change again: Core seems (?) to be in progress of being opened. > I.e. it's up to you+RH to pick up this opportunity to change something > about "Legacy". I am offering to contribute to a "Legacy within Fedora" > > Unfortunately you and Warren seem to be choke this option once more. So > be it - Your decision. That's because at least I don't see the need to try and hammer the square Fedora peg into the LTS hole. Especially when there are nice round pegs like RHEL with actual support and SLAs or CentOS with a large and vibrant community, both of which are based on Fedora, that fit perfectly into that LTS hole. Why continue beating a square peg into a round hole? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp08TUhAURKP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
