Dom, 2007-01-14 às 08:54 -0500, Jesse Keating escreveu: > On Saturday 13 January 2007 19:21, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > As long as "base" is an order or two of magnitude more sane than what it > > currently is, fine by me. > > > > In fact, I think that what I'm hoping for (and what Seth could probably > > also agree) is that when you select base on a kickstart installation you > > don't get to have to install openldap (just an example, there are a lot > > more instances of this problems) without breaking dependencies. > > Perhaps what we can do is move a few things over to @Core, allow base to have > some of the things other seem to want like network diag tools. Those that > want the barest possible can use @Core in kickstarts instead of @Base, and > grow from there. That would be nice! Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
