Re: Fedora Server Spin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 13 January 2007 19:21, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> As long as "base" is an order or two of magnitude more sane than what it
> currently is, fine by me.
>
> In fact, I think that what I'm hoping for (and what Seth could probably
> also agree) is that when you select base on a kickstart installation you
> don't get to have to install openldap (just an example, there are a lot
> more instances of this problems) without breaking dependencies.

Perhaps what we can do is move a few things over to @Core, allow base to have 
some of the things other seem to want like network diag tools.  Those that 
want the barest possible can use @Core in kickstarts instead of @Base, and 
grow from there.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgp1bAzVDTF9q.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux