2:42pm seth vidal said: > On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 13:59 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > That sounds like a "Server" spin to me. > > > > One thing we want to be very clear is that this is NOT designed for mission > > critical or even production systems, especially with just a 13month life > > span, and rapid adoption of new releases rather than backports. While it has > > the name "server" it means that this is useful if you're setting up a server, > > not that we're going to offer any kind of support, do anything different for > > the updates, etc... > > +1 > > -sv > Sure, but a rapid devel cycle is no excuse for a crappy OS. :-/ Consider that if the Fedora 7 Server has the admittedly idealistic goal of being mission critical--for just 13 months--it would be much better quality for *any* use. ../C -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
