On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 16:35 -0800, Curtis Doty wrote: > 3:33pm David Lutterkort said: > > > > Anybody interested in Fedora Server should have a look at the package > > list and let me know if they think a package should be classified > > differently; for the Maybe group, I'd appreciate comments on whether the > > packages should be included or not (e.g., should FSS support dynamic DNS > > and include the various clients for dyndns.org etc. ?) > > > > This may be debatable, but avahi should *not* be part of the minimal > install. Maybe as an option...with the 802.1X supplicant just mentioned. Yeah, I think it should be out, too (not just the minimal install, but out of the Fedora Server spin in general) > And mildly related, I have a couple server-class environments that desire > ImageMagick. The fc6 rpm would have produced a 50 package dependency list! > Some made sense. But others, like avahi, made none. The full dependency list for ImageMagick is huge .. part of the problem is that the package contains stuff that makes sense on a server like convert and things that don't, like display; but unless somebody has the time and inclination to pick the package apart and turn it into two (or more) that's not likely to improve. David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
