3:33pm David Lutterkort said: > > Anybody interested in Fedora Server should have a look at the package > list and let me know if they think a package should be classified > differently; for the Maybe group, I'd appreciate comments on whether the > packages should be included or not (e.g., should FSS support dynamic DNS > and include the various clients for dyndns.org etc. ?) > This may be debatable, but avahi should *not* be part of the minimal install. Maybe as an option...with the 802.1X supplicant just mentioned. And mildly related, I have a couple server-class environments that desire ImageMagick. The fc6 rpm would have produced a 50 package dependency list! Some made sense. But others, like avahi, made none. ../C -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
