Nicolas Mailhot schrieb: > Le Jeu 11 janvier 2007 15:42, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit : >> Nicolas Mailhot schrieb: >>> Le mercredi 10 janvier 2007 à 13:48 -0600, Josh Boyer a écrit : >>>> On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 20:46 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >>>>> Le jeudi 11 janvier 2007 à 00:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : >>>>>> Its even mentioned clearly in the wiki link that Thorsten posted. Do >>>>>> read it completely first. >>>>> Not to this level of detail. >>>>> And I care about this level of detail, because that's where we have >>>>> subtle variations right now. >>>> You realize that it'll break any existing filters if we go off renaming >>>> things right? >>> The other renamings will break filters anyway. There's only one thing >>> worse than incompatible changes — halfway-incompatible changes. >> Well, there are so many lists with "-list" postfix. Renaming all of them >> just for the sake of being consistent with all those others that don't >> have a "list" postfix is IMHO not worth the trouble for the users. > It is worth the trouble. Do others agree with that? (Send me private yes/no if you don't want to spam the list with "mee, too"-mails !) > And I write it as someone with more -list than > non-list subscriptions, who will have a merry time during the change. I'll > gladly sacrifice my setup to the consistency altar. > > If you want to go the "minimum changes" route I'll insist to have all > lists grow a -list postfix, non-postfixed lists are the oddball here ;) I don't care much about to -list or not to -list, but having it consistent might be good. I'm taking opinions on that, too (in private or on the list). CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
