Le Jeu 11 janvier 2007 15:42, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot schrieb: >> Le mercredi 10 janvier 2007 à 13:48 -0600, Josh Boyer a écrit : >>> On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 20:46 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >>>> Le jeudi 11 janvier 2007 à 00:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : >>>>> Its even mentioned clearly in the wiki link that Thorsten posted. Do >>>>> read it completely first. >>>> Not to this level of detail. >>>> And I care about this level of detail, because that's where we have >>>> subtle variations right now. >>> You realize that it'll break any existing filters if we go off renaming >>> things right? >> The other renamings will break filters anyway. There's only one thing >> worse than incompatible changes — halfway-incompatible changes. > > Well, there are so many lists with "-list" postfix. Renaming all of them > just for the sake of being consistent with all those others that don't > have a "list" postfix is IMHO not worth the trouble for the users. It is worth the trouble. And I write it as someone with more -list than non-list subscriptions, who will have a merry time during the change. I'll gladly sacrifice my setup to the consistency altar. If you want to go the "minimum changes" route I'll insist to have all lists grow a -list postfix, non-postfixed lists are the oddball here ;) Please do it right, or don't do it at all. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
