On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 13:39 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 13:25, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > The tarball IMHO is not relevant. The upstream version is 2.6.20-rc4. > > It's a pre-release. And we have rules for how to package those: > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines > > Section "Pre-Release packages": > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b > >6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a > > The tarball used is important in this case. The patches we prepare and such > are against the 2.6.19 tarball, NOT the 2.6.20. The unmodified source we're > using is 2.6.19 and that defines the release of the package. The first patch applied is the 2.6.20-rc4 patch. So actually all our custom patches which follow it must be adjusted according to that. So although the tarball is 2.6.19 the final kernel definitely is 2.6.20-rc4 + patches. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
