On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 13:03 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 09.01.2007 12:47, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> If I would review the kernel for the extras merge I'd say "fix this". > >> But I suspect davej won't like to call the kernels 2.6.20 (e.g. > >> 2.6.20-1.2906.rc4.fc7 for example) before they are actually 2.6.20 > > Neither would I. It's not 2.6.20. It's 2.6.19 + patches. :) > > It's called 2.6.20-rcX upstream, so we should IMHO be able to call it > something similar, too. If you look a the kernel .spec you will see that there is "linux-2.6.19.tar.bz2" plus "patch-2.6.20-rc4.bz2". So the RPM version is reflecting the fact that it's the 2.6.19 plus patches. Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
