Re: Status of User Private Group Scheme (UPG)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Status of User Private Group Scheme (UPG)
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:32:26 +0800
Cc: Dax Kelson <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20070107093755.GA17298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1168040844.3358.67.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070107093755.GA17298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 10:37 +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
> UPG stay in entirely and the change is reverted since end of Nov. within
> FC-development. 

Could we have an erratum for FC6 too please?

-- 
dwmw2

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Status of User Private Group Scheme (UPG)
  - From: Dax Kelson
- Re: Status of User Private Group Scheme (UPG)
  - From: Florian La Roche

Prev by Date: Re: Fedora 7
Next by Date: Re: experimental 2.6.19 kernel preview.
Previous by thread: Re: Status of User Private Group Scheme (UPG)
Next by thread: Grub 2 and FC7?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux