On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 22:58 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > > On 1/5/07, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > >> We *already* have both. Beryl is in Fedora Extras currently. With the > >> merge in place, the only argument is what should be the default and here > >> is where code quality does matter. > > > > And fedora packager reponse quality as well ! > > We cant change defaults just because the package maintainers within > Fedora dont respond. The solution to that is to post to this list with > bug reports to check on progress if there is none for a unreasonable > amount of time. This is one of the reasons why I have been advocating > weekly irc development meetings. Raise the issue there and solving it > should make it more transparent. Careful. There's lots of bugs that could pop up like that. Without some kind of "importance" system, you'll get lots of noise. For example, I have a vim bug opened long ago that has just sat there. Is it critical? No. Is it damn annoying? Yes. "Unreasonable amount of time" is subjective. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
