Rahul Sundaram schrieb: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Jesse Keating schrieb: >>> On Friday 05 January 2007 01:55, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> This issue brings up a interesting question: Which board has the power >>>> to influence and adjust this particular naming scheme in our new >>>> "merged" world? FESCo or the Fedora Board? >>> Ultimately I feel it should be the Fedora board. >> Nearly the same wording as jeremy two minutes earlier ;-) >> Well, I can live with that, but could one of the Board members (I'm sure >> at least Rahul, Jeremy and rdieter will read this mail) bring this issue >> up in the next Board meeting please? > Yes. I will. Many thanks. > My opinion as I have already expressed before several times > is that we need to replace the core cabal and FESCo with a technical > steering committee with public irc weekly meetings and only escalate > issues to the board if there is heavy conflict. The more board members > are involved in micro management, the less we will be thinking about > long term changes. Fully agreed. CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
