On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:05:45 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Some examples: > * Lack of control over the release process (Currently, packages are > automatically being pushed - No chance for a maintainer to withdraw a > broken/mis-compiled built). Except when you mail the Extras signers before the next push, a broken build can be skipped easily. And of course, the %check section is very useful for custom sanity checks, too. > I would expect maintainers to give "explicit > clearance" before a package is being released. Which sounds more like the future web-based updates system. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list