Re: LVM not fit for default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> First of all I have experienced the same "no help hell" with lvm when  
> it crashes. (not if, when) I had FC3 installed on my Compaq R3000  
> Series notebook, default settings, except for package options. Ran  
> that for about three weeks. I reinstall testing out new distros quite  
> a lot, so I don't worry about backing up the entire system, and  
> something happened with the system, the kernel panicked  when it  
> couldn't find a root FS. Same problem as andy.
> 
> Basically All I'm trying to say is that yes it fails sometime, no it  
> is a cool thing to have, but either give us some tools on default  
> install/rescue disc to combat the issue, or take it out unless the  
> system detects a RAID array.
> 
> Thanks guys,
> 
> Chris

Come on, "FC3" got released *three*years* ago, so it's not appropriate to make an argument out of this for discussing today's maturity of "LVM". Btw, I have been using "LVM" exclusively for 3 years now [exact, since I first installed "FC3"], and I have never ever had any trouble with it at all. Maybe you encountered a hardware problem?
-- 
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! 
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux