Re: with python-2.5, where to put site-packages on x86-64.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 18:55 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
> > On 12/16/06, sean <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> No i386 python:
> >>
> >> python-2.5-6.fc7.x86_64
> >> python-devel-2.5-6.fc7.x86_64
> >> python-docs-2.5-1.fc7.noarch
> >> python-libs-2.5-6.fc7.x86_64
> >> python-tools-2.5-6.fc7.x86_64
> >>
> >> But all the related packages are populating
> >> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages.
> >>
> >> And:
> >>
> >> python
> >> Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Dec 15 2006, 11:08:48)
> >> [GCC 4.1.1 20061213 (Red Hat 4.1.1-47)] on linux2
> >> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
> >> information.
> >>  >>> from distutils import sysconfig
> >>  >>> print  sysconfig.get_python_lib()
> >> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
> >>
> > What does sysconfig.get_python_lib(1) return?  It should be:
> > /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages
> > 
> >> Is this the desired packaging? For my own stuff does it even
> >> matter?
> >>
> > arch specific python packages should go to
> > /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages and arch independent python
> > packages should go to /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
> > 
> > Is this not what's happening for you?  Are there .so files being saved
> > into /usr/lib/python2.5?
> > 
> > -Toshio
> > 
> 
> IIUC this setup is actually broken.  Packages that have both arch-indep and
> arch-dep will not be found correctly with this scheme.  AFAIK this has not
> been fixed in python, and python authors said that this scheme is wrong.
> 
The problem you are describing occurs when the arch specific portion of
a package is installed in /usr/lib64/ and the arch independent portion
is installed in /usr/lib/.

This is not the case in the scenario I describe: the whole of an arch
specific package is installed into /usr/lib64/ and the whole of an arch
independent package is installed into /usr/lib/.

I still don't know what exactly the OP is seeing, though.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux