Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On 12/16/06, sean <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> No i386 python: >> >> python-2.5-6.fc7.x86_64 >> python-devel-2.5-6.fc7.x86_64 >> python-docs-2.5-1.fc7.noarch >> python-libs-2.5-6.fc7.x86_64 >> python-tools-2.5-6.fc7.x86_64 >> >> But all the related packages are populating >> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages. >> >> And: >> >> python >> Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Dec 15 2006, 11:08:48) >> [GCC 4.1.1 20061213 (Red Hat 4.1.1-47)] on linux2 >> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more >> information. >> >>> from distutils import sysconfig >> >>> print sysconfig.get_python_lib() >> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages >> > What does sysconfig.get_python_lib(1) return? It should be: > /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages > >> Is this the desired packaging? For my own stuff does it even >> matter? >> > arch specific python packages should go to > /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages and arch independent python > packages should go to /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages > > Is this not what's happening for you? Are there .so files being saved > into /usr/lib/python2.5? > > -Toshio > IIUC this setup is actually broken. Packages that have both arch-indep and arch-dep will not be found correctly with this scheme. AFAIK this has not been fixed in python, and python authors said that this scheme is wrong. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
