Le mardi 05 décembre 2006 à 14:49 -0500, David Zeuthen a écrit : > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:50 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > gconf does not need to be "fixed" (well it does but that's not the major > > problem). What need to be "fixed" are developper assumptions and the way > > they routinely abuse gconf in admin-unfriendly ways. > > Bah, blanket statement, anyone can write crap with even the finest > tools. So, care to make specific complaints about g-p-m's scheme > > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-power-manager/data/gnome-power-manager.schemas.in?rev=1.52&view=markup > > and how that is "difficult" for admins to grasp? My only complaint is > that perhaps g-p-m suffers from too many options. Care to post an actual conf file sample ? That's what sysadmins will see. gnome-power-manager.schemas.in is about as interesting to them as a corba IDL declaration. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
