On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:50 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > gconf does not need to be "fixed" (well it does but that's not the major > problem). What need to be "fixed" are developper assumptions and the way > they routinely abuse gconf in admin-unfriendly ways. Bah, blanket statement, anyone can write crap with even the finest tools. So, care to make specific complaints about g-p-m's scheme http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-power-manager/data/gnome-power-manager.schemas.in?rev=1.52&view=markup and how that is "difficult" for admins to grasp? My only complaint is that perhaps g-p-m suffers from too many options. David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
