David Nielsen napsal(a): > This also assumes that there are no problems with the current scheme > though. By moving to a configuration storage scheme like gconf we get > the option of having all key explanations be translated and having one > common format and syntax, I think those two factors alone make it worth > considering seriously. OTOH the key explanations are moved away from the options they describe, making them, again, harder to use without a specialized tool. It would be possible to write a tool that dumps a GConf subtree along with the comments to an ini-like file and accepts a modified file as a source of data to store back to GConf, but try storing that in a versioning system. Mirek -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
