Once upon a time, Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > If our layout was logical we would not have /usr in the first place. > > Does anyone still mount /usr later? If so, why? On my servers, I still typically have a separate /usr that is mounted read-only. I figure since no writes can occur (not even things like atime updates), there's little chance of seeing any filesystem corruption from anything (and it never needs fsck or journal recovery on an unclean shutdown). Also, this way / is a lot smaller; again, less likely to have errors and fsck/journal replay have much less to do (so less chance for error). -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
