Re: Reducing Fedora memory footprint?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:27 +0100, Leszek Matok wrote:
> Now you're comparing apples and oranges. I was talking about apt from
> Extras, using repomd repositories. You're comparing yum with Debian's
> apt with their repos (different number of files and packages; should be
> greater, but I don't know if "main" contains all their packages, or is
> it something like our "Core").
> 
> apt-rpm also has its own repo format which is much faster to download
> and parse than repomd. You should check it out :)
> 
> Lam

I would have conducted an apt-rpm vs yum test, but I'm on x86_64, and
last time I checked, apt has lousy bi-arch support. (Did it improve)
FYI I'm using Debian unstable which has comparable number of packages.

- Gilboa

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux