On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:27 +0100, Leszek Matok wrote: > Now you're comparing apples and oranges. I was talking about apt from > Extras, using repomd repositories. You're comparing yum with Debian's > apt with their repos (different number of files and packages; should be > greater, but I don't know if "main" contains all their packages, or is > it something like our "Core"). > > apt-rpm also has its own repo format which is much faster to download > and parse than repomd. You should check it out :) > > Lam I would have conducted an apt-rpm vs yum test, but I'm on x86_64, and last time I checked, apt has lousy bi-arch support. (Did it improve) FYI I'm using Debian unstable which has comparable number of packages. - Gilboa -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
