Re: Static linking considered harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:08:34AM +0000, Andy Green wrote:
> Olivier Galibert wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:53:58AM +0000, Andy Green wrote:
> 
> >>You could alter your build methodology so that each of the target 
> >>boxes,eg, rebuilds an SRPM with the local library environment?  You need 
> >>the compiler and -devel bits and bobs then on the boxes.
> >
> >That's the point where he should use gentoo and not fedora.
> 
> But he isn't just using Fedora, he has a bunch of not very compatible OS 
> installs of varying ages, and he would need to work around this change 
> one way or another.  I didn't miss the joke but if he could actually use 
> Gentoo or anything else that was the same on all the boxes that would 
> indeed solve his problem.

It was only half-a-joke.  If the Fedora solution to backwards binary
compatibility is "recompile locally every application", then Gentoo is
much better at that kind of job.

  OG.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux