On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:08:34AM +0000, Andy Green wrote: > Olivier Galibert wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:53:58AM +0000, Andy Green wrote: > > >>You could alter your build methodology so that each of the target > >>boxes,eg, rebuilds an SRPM with the local library environment? You need > >>the compiler and -devel bits and bobs then on the boxes. > > > >That's the point where he should use gentoo and not fedora. > > But he isn't just using Fedora, he has a bunch of not very compatible OS > installs of varying ages, and he would need to work around this change > one way or another. I didn't miss the joke but if he could actually use > Gentoo or anything else that was the same on all the boxes that would > indeed solve his problem. It was only half-a-joke. If the Fedora solution to backwards binary compatibility is "recompile locally every application", then Gentoo is much better at that kind of job. OG. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
